Jaffe v. Capital One Bank et al
Philip Jaffe |
Capital One Bank, Capital One Services, Inc., Capital One, F.S.B., Washington Mutual Bank, Chase Bank, USA, N.A. and American Express |
1:2009cv04106 |
April 27, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Paul G. Gardephe |
Plaintiff |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER: #98597 For the reasons set forth above, Defendants motions to dismiss are GRANTED as follows:(1) The FDIC Receiver is substituted for Defendant Washington Mutual and Plaintiffs Washington Mutual-related claims are dismissed without prejudice. (2) Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Chase are dismissed with prejudice. (3) Plaintiffs fraud, conversion, unjust enrichment and Fair Credit Billing Act claims against Defendants Capital One and American Express are dismissed. Plaintif f may seek leave to amend the Complaint within ten days (i.e., by March 11, 2010) as to these claims and these defendants.(4) Plaintiffs causes of action for damages and attorneys fees are dismissed, and the class allegations are struck from the Comp laint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the following motions - Docket Nos. 4,13,18,21 - and to terminate Washington Mutual and Chase as defendants. So Ordered (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 3/1/2010) (js) Modified on 3/2/2010 (ajc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.