UBS International Inc. et al v. Itete Brasil Instalacoes Telefonicas Ltd. et al
Defendant: Itete Brasil Instalacoes Telefonicas Ltd. and Instalaciones De Telefonos, S.A.
Interpleader Plaintiff: UBS International Inc. and UBS Financial Services Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv04286
Filed: May 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Lewis A. Kaplan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 Interpleader Action
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 168 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons set forth in this memorandum and order, the MUSP Defendants shall be precluded from asserting that the funds in the subject UBS accounts are in any way related to any advances that the MUSP Defendants may have ma de on behalf of Itete Brasil. In addition, no later than April 30, 2011, the MUSP Defendants shall pay Itete Spain's attorneys' fees in the amount of $10,000.00. Terminating (158) Motion to Dismiss in case 1:09-cv-04286-LAK -JCF. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 4/11/11) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-04286-LAK -JCF, 1:09-cv-10004-LAK Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rjm)
April 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER: Accordingly, Itete Spain's motion [DI 95] is granted. Itete Brasil's answer in No. 09-4286 (LAK) is stricken and its cross-claim is dismissed with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 4/12/2010) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-04286-LAK-JCF, 1:09-cv-10004-LAK(jpo)
February 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 87 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO INTERVENE, CONSOLIDATING ACTIONS, ALLOWING INTERPLEADER AND GRANTING OTHER RELIEF: The motions ofltete Spain [Action No. 1 DI 7] and UBS [Action No. 1 DI 16] (1) to intervene and consolidate these actions and (2 ) for interpleader reliefand consolidation of actions and for other relief, respectively, are granted in all respects. More particularly: Itete Spain's proposed complaint in intervention and cross-claims is deemed served and filed this date. Act ion No. 1 is consolidated into Action No.2 for all purposes. The caption in Action No.2 [09 Civ. 4286] is amended to read as set forth in this Order. UBS, no later than March 2, 2010, shall deposit into the Registry of this Court $975,000 from Account No. R2-62467 and $25,000 from Account No. R2-66223, which funds shall remain in the Registry of this Court pending further order of the Court. Albuquerque, MUSP, Itete Brasil and Itete Spain, as well as any other persons or entities tha t have asserted or may assert any claims against UBS relating to the funds referred to in paragraph 2 above, are enjoined and restrained from asserting any claims against UBS relating thereto and from commencing or prosecuting any other action or pro ceeding against UBS to recover all or part of those funds. Upon deposit of the funds referred to in paragraph 2 into the Registry of the Court, UBS shall be dismissed from this action, other than for purposes of discovery, and discharged from all lia bilities to Albuquerque, MUSP, Itete Brasil and Itete Spain, as well as any other persons or entities that have asserted or may assert any claims against UBS, in each case relating to the funds deposited pursuant to this order. UBS shall recover from the interpleaded funds such attorney's fees and costs as the Court may award. Any motion for such an award shall be filed on or before March 10, 2010. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 2/24/2010) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-04286-LAK-JCF, 1:09-cv-10004-LAK(jpo)
December 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Itete Brasil's motion for judgment on the pleadings and other relief (DI46) is granted to the extent that Itete Spain's affirmative defenses are stricken with leave to replead on or before 1/15/10. It is denied in all other respects. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 12/17/09) (cd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UBS International Inc. et al v. Itete Brasil Instalacoes Telefonicas Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interpleader plaintiff: UBS International Inc.
Represented By: Julian W. Wells
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interpleader plaintiff: UBS Financial Services Inc.
Represented By: Julian W. Wells
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Itete Brasil Instalacoes Telefonicas Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Instalaciones De Telefonos, S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?