Securities and Exchange Commission v. Reserve Management Company, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Reserve Management Company, Inc., Resrv Partners, Inc., Bruce Bent, Sr. and Bruce Bent, II
Relief Defendant: The Reserve Primary Fund
Case Number: 1:2009cv04346
Filed: May 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 648 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons stated above, the Commissions motion for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial is DENIED. Defendants motion for judgment as a matter of law is DENIED. Defendants motion to amend the Judgment is GR ANTED to the extent that the Court will issue an Amended Judgment indicating that Bent II, RMCI, and Resrv Partners violated Section 17(a)(2) or (3) of the Securities Act. The motion to amend is otherwise DENIED.The Commissions motion for disgorgemen t is DENIED. A civil penalty of $325,000 is imposed on RMCI, and a civil penalty of $325,000 is also imposed on Resrv Partners. A $100,000 civil penalty is imposed on Bent II. The Commission's motion for apermanent injunction against Defendants RMCI, Resrv Partners, and Bent II is DENIED.The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions (Dkt. Nos. 616, 617) and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/30/2013) (cd)
May 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 372 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, the Commission's request for an order compelling Defendants to produce emails exchanged between Bent II and his wife on September 15 and 16, 2008 is GRANTED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 5/23/11) (rjm)
February 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 272 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: #98595 (122 in 1:09-cv-04346-PGG) MOTION to Dismiss. For reasons further set forth in said Order, Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion. (Docket No. 122). (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 2/24/10) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-md-02011-PGG, 1:09-cv-04346-PGG(db) Modified on 2/25/2010 (ajc).
November 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 201 MEMORANDUM OPINION No. - - - - -. For the reasons set forth above, this Court will enter an order providing for, inter alia, a pro rata distribution of the remaining assets of the Primary Fund; an injunction barring all claims against (1) Primary Fun d assets, including shareholder claims against the Primary Fund; and (2) any of the Defendants and any of the Defendants' officers, directors, trustees, representatives, agents or employees to the extent that such claims are subject to indemnifi cation by the Primary Fund; and the appointment of a monitor or magistrate judge to oversee the distribution of Primary Fund assets and to review any claims by the Primary Fund's adviser or distributor for management fees and expenses and any claims by indemnitees for indemnification expenses, among other duties. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 11/25/09) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-md-02011-PGG, 1:09-cv-04346-PGG(rjm)
November 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER: It is hereby ordered that there will be a conference in this matter in this matter on November 9, 2009, at 230 p.m. in Courtroom 18B of the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, as set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 11/5/2009) (jpo) Modified on 11/18/2009 (jpo).
October 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 169 ORDER....Telephone Conference set for 10/8/2009 at 03:30 PM before Judge Paul G. Gardephe. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 10/5/09) (cd)
September 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 168 ORDER: It is hereby ordered that 1. the Commission shall file, by October 1, 2009, a final proposed order, as well as a list of three individuals it recommends the Court consider for appointment as Monitor, in the event that the Commission's Pla n of Distribution is approved; 2. any party or claimant who wishes to submit additional briefing conceming either the "claw back" provision or the appropriate treatment of "straddler" investors may do so by October 6,2009, by fili ng their submission with the Court and serving copies on Commission counsel, Nancy A. Brown, Esq., Securities and Exchange Commission, 3 World Financial Center, New York, New York 10281; 3. the Massachusetts Securities Division may submit an amicus brief concerning the "claw back" and "straddler" investor issues by October 6,2009. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/23/2009) (jpo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Reserve Management Company, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: James Clarkson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reserve Management Company, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Joseph Meade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Resrv Partners, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Joseph Meade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce Bent, Sr.
Represented By: Christopher Joseph Meade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce Bent, II
Represented By: Christopher Joseph Meade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Relief defendant: The Reserve Primary Fund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?