Learning Annex Holdings, LLC et al v. Whitney Education Group, Inc. et al
Learning Annex Holdings, LLC and Learning Annex, LLC |
Whitney Education Group, Inc., Whitney Information Network, Inc., Wealth Intelligence Academy, Inc., Wealth Intelligence Agency, Rich Dad Education, LLC, Rich Global, LLC, The Rich Dad Company, Cashflow Technologies, Inc., John Does # 1-10 and XYZ Corp. # 1-10 |
1:2009cv04432 |
May 8, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Gabriel W. Gorenstein |
Shira A. Scheindlin |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 203 OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons in this opinion and order, Rich Global's motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion [Docket No. 195]. Re: 195 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the alternative, For a New Trial filed by Rich Global, LLC. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/13/2012) (rjm) |
Filing 142 OPINION AND ORDER: For the aforementioned reasons, defendants Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, a New Trial is granted in part to the extent I grant judgment as a matter of law to CTI and a new trial on damages to Rich Gl obal, LLC. Plaintiffs Motion to Reinstate Their Claim for Unjust Enrichment and for Entry of Judgment on that Claim is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion [Docket No. 130]. A conference is scheduled for 1/25/2012 at 4:30 p.m. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/11/2012) (ft) |
Filing 124 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the aforementioned reasons, Learning Annexs unjust enrichment claim is dismissed. If Defendants wish to file a post-trial motion, they may now do so. Defendants may raise any issue they deem appropriate but should ad dress the propriety of the jurys award of damages. The moving brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order; the opposition brief is due thirty days later; and the reply is due fifteen days after submission of the opposition. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/12/2011) (ab) |
Filing 118 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that for the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' motion to add Learning Annex L.P. as a party is granted. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/3/11) (cd) |
Filing 95 OPINION AND ORDER: This trial in this case will proceed. I will charge the jury as to quantum meruit (and the Statute of Frauds defense) and as to the elements of unjust enrichment, and will take an advisory verdict on unjust enrichment. If the jury returns a verdict for Learning Annex on the quantum meruit claim, I will then determine whether Rich Dad was unjustly enriched. If I determine that Rich Dad was unjustly enriched then judgment will be entered for Learning Annex basec on the jury's verdict of on damages. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/11/2011) (jfe) |
Filing 70 OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons in this opinion and order, RD's motion is denied as to Causes of Action 10, 11, and 14 and granted as to all other Causes of Action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion [Docket Nos. 51 and 54]. A conference is scheduled for February 14, 2011 at 4:30 PM. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/25/2011) (rjm) |
Filing 27 PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material.... (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 11/5/2009) (jpo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.