Sissel et al v. Klimley et al
| D. Kent Sissel, Timothy Sissel, Amanda White, Theo M. Siering, Lila G. Siering, Chelsea A. Oeter, Darlene Oeter, Darin L. Oeter, Herman C. Baker, Joan M. Baker, Renee Baker, James E. Arrowood, Regeana K. Arrowood, Jay D. Tiecke, Margaret A. Tiecke, Beth R. King Mason, Lori J. Ulch, Kenneth C. Leimkuehler, Constance Leimkuehler, Sally Black and Holly Vroman |
| Laura Klimley, Maxine Eimicke, John Palmero, Hereford Collection and Credit Agency, Inc. and The Victor W. and Maxine Eimicke Foundation |
| 1:2009cv04527 |
| May 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Paul G. Gardephe |
| None |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 25 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Theo M. Siering, Beth R. King Mason, Chelsea A. Oeter, Holly Vroman, Margaret A. Tiecke, Constance Leimkuehler, Joan M. Baker, Darin L. Oeter, Lori J. Ulch, Regea na K. Arrowood, Timothy Sissel, Darlene Oeter, Lila G. Siering, D. Kent Sissel, Jay D. Tiecke, Herman C. Baker, Amanda White, James E. Arrowood, Sally Black, Kenneth C. Leimkuehler, Renee Baker, 27 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Theo M. Siering, Beth R. King Mason, Chelsea A. Oeter, Holly Vroman, Margaret A. Tiecke, Constance Leimkuehler, Joan M. Baker, Darin L. Oeter, Lori J. Ulch, Regeana K. Arrowood, Timothy Sissel, Darlene Oeter, Lila G. Siering, D. Kent Sissel , Jay D. Tiecke, Herman C. Baker, Amanda White, James E. Arrowood, Sally Black, Kenneth C. Leimkuehler, Renee Baker. Plaintiffs' amended motions for leave to amend in the Sissel and Cohain actions (09-cv-4527, Dkt. No. 27; and 08-cv5047, Dkt. No . 51) are DENIED. Plaintiffs' original motions for leave to amend in these actions (09-cv-4527, Dkt. No. 25; and 08-cv5047, Dkt. No. 49) are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 8/30/2011) (lmb) Modified on 8/31/2011 (lmb).
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, Klimley and Palmeros motions to dismiss the Cohain and Sissel Actions are GRANTED. Palmeros motion to dismiss is DENIED with respect to the Pullins Plaintiffs claims for common law fraud and civil conspiracy but otherwise GRANTED. Plaintiffs may seek leave to amend their Complaints within ten calendar days. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the following motions: 08 Civ. 5047 - Docket Nos. 33, 35; 09 Civ. 4527 - Docket Nos. 12, 17; 09 Civ. 10584 - Docket No.5. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/20/2010) (jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
