International Bottled Water Association et al v. Paterson et al
| International Bottled Water Association, Nestle Waters North America, Inc. and Polar Corp. |
| David A. Paterson, Andrew M. Cuomo, Alexander B. Grannis, Patrick Hooker and Robert L. Megna |
| 1:2009cv04672 |
| May 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Deborah A. Batts |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER: To the extent that the previous Order entered by this Court modified Paragraph (2) of the May 29, 2009 Preliminary Injunction ORDER, it should have read: "Defendants are enjoined from implementing and enforcing any and all other amendment s pertaining exclusively to bottled water products made by Part SS of Chapter 59 of the Laws of 2009 to Title 10 of Article 27 of the N.Y. Environmental Conservation Law until October 22, 2009." (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 9/4/2009) (jpo)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER: The Court's injunction of the New York-exclusive UPC provisions of the Bottle Bill Amendments remains in full force and effect. N.Y. Envtl.Conserv.Law § 27-1012, 12 (as amended 2009. To the extent that the Court has enjoined enforce ment of Amendments to the Bottle Bill impacting bottled beverages other than bottled water, that injunction is HEREBY LIFTED; Defendants are not enjoined from immediately implementing and enforcing all provisions impacting bottled beverages, other th an bottled water, including provisions that went into effect on April 1, April 7, and the remaining provisions that were effective June 1, 2009. In addition, all Parties SHALL appear on Thursday October 22, 2009, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY in Co urtroom 24B, at which time Plaintiffs International Bottled Water Association, Nestle Waters North America Inc., and Polar Corp d/b/a Polar Beverages, SHALL SHOW CAUSE why Due Process requires a continuation of the injunction. There shall be no modi fication of the bond in the amount of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) already posted with the Court. Consequently, Paragraph (2) of the May 29, 2009 Preliminary Injunction ORDER shall be MODIFIED to read: "Defendants are enjoined from imp lementing and enforcing any and all other amendments pertaining exclusively to bottled water products made by Part SS of Chapter 59 of the Laws of 2009 to Title 10 of Article 27 of the N.Y. Environmental Conservation Law until October 22, 2010." (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 8/13/2009) (jpo)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER: The Parties currently before the Court are in serious settlement negotiations. The Court finds that the additional parties seeking intervention have interests that are more than adequately represented by the Parties before the Court currently. Accordingly, no motions to intervene shall be entertained by the Court at this time. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 7/7/2009) (jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
