Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation v. Carvel et al
Plaintiff: Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation
Defendant: Pamela Carvel and The Carvel Foundation Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv05083
Filed: June 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Dolinger
Presiding Judge: Jed S. Rakoff
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER: Accordingly, the Court has reviewed the objections and underlying record de novo. Having done so, the court finds itself in complete agreement with the Report, which the Court hereby adopts by reference. Among other things, this means that aforesaid injunction takes effect immediately. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment and to close documents 5 and 41 on the docket of this case. So ordered (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 8/19/2010) (js)
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER: Defendant Pamela Carvel having served an affidavit and memorandum of law in support of a motion for sanctions and treble damages under Judiciary Law § 487 against plaintiff and its lawyers on September 24, 2009, we deem this a motion for sanctions and it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff is to serve and file any response to the motion by Thursday, October 8, 2009. Defendant must serve and file any reply by Thursday, October 15, 2009. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger on 9/29/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(jpo)
September 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER: Counterclaim defendants having filed a motion to dismiss counterclaims and for sanctions on August 28, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that counterclaim plaintiff is to serve and file any response to counterclaim defendants' motion by Thursday, September 24, 2009. Counterclaim defendants must serve and file any reply by Thursday, October 1, 2009. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger on 9/3/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers(jpo)
July 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER...The Carvel Foundation is ORDERED to enter an appearance through counsel by 8/7/09. If it fails to do so, it will face the entry of a default judgment. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger on 7/7/09) Copies sent by chambers(cd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation v. Carvel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pamela Carvel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Carvel Foundation Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?