Edrisse v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
| Nagy Edrisse |
| Marriott International, Inc., Frank Berry, George Palladino, Michael Stengel, David Traina, Steven Bata, Robert Miller and Janet Mielcarek |
| 1:2009cv05141 |
| June 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Lewis A. Kaplan |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the foregoing reasons, (1) Berry's motion for summary judgment of dismissal [DI 28] is granted to the extent that all of plaintiff's retaliation claims against him are dismissed, (2) the Marriott Defendants' mot ion for summary judgment of dismissal [DI 32] is granted to the extent that all of plaintiff's hostile work environment claims against Marriot, except the claim brought under the NYCHRL, are dismissed, all of plaintiff's hostile work enviro nment and discrimination claims against the Individual Marriott Defendants are dismissed, and all of plaintiff's retaliation claims against the Individual Marriott Defendants other than Stengel are dismissed, and (3) all of plaintiff's age discrimination claims are dismissed. The motions are denied in all other respects. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 12/13/2010) (jpo) (ad).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
