Castilla v. City of New York et al
Plaintiff: |
Lilian Castilla |
Defendant: |
City of New York, Oscar Sandino and John Doe Officers 1-10 |
Case Number: |
1:2009cv05446 |
Filed: |
June 12, 2009 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Office: |
Foley Square Office |
County: |
New York |
Presiding Judge: |
Sidney H. Stein |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
November 14, 2012 |
Filing
95
OPINION AND ORDER: Lilian Castilla was the victim of a shocking sexual assault committed by a member of the New York City Police Department. That man is now serving a term in prison for his crimes. But shocking crimes alone cannot impute liability to the City of New York. Plaintiff has had ample opportunity to seek evidence to prove the existence of a municipal policy, custom, or usage, but her attorney has failed to develop a record sufficient to survive a motion for summary judgment. Because C astilla has failed to create a genuine issue as to any material fact, this Court grants the Citys motion. This action will now proceed against Sandino. Plaintiff has thirty days from the entry of this Order in which to move for summary judgment in her favor against Sandino. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 11/14/2012) (ago)
|
September 6, 2012 |
Filing
94
OPINION re: 76 MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by City of New York. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the City's motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to Castilla's claims against the City is denied. Plaintiff i s entitled to discovery regarding the City's policies and practices regarding training, supervision, and discipline in connection with male officers' handling of female suspects, prospective confidential informants, and informants. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 8/22/2011) (ama)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?