Arnold v. 1199 SEIU

Arnold v. 1199 SEIU

Plaintiff:	Andrew Arnold
Defendant:	1199 SEIU
Case Number:	1:2009cv05576
Filed:	June 17, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Bronx
Presiding Judge:	Denise L. Cote
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 15, 2009	Filing 23 OPINION and ORDER re:#98358 5 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(B)(6) and MOTION for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Rule 56. The above Union's June 29 motion to dismiss is granted as to plaintiff's claims for breach of contract and tort ious interference with contract, and the Union's June 29 motion for summary judgment is granted as to plaintiff's hybrid Section 301/fair representation claim on the basis that the claim is time-barred. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 12/15/09); copies forwarded by Chambers. copies mailed by chambers..(djc) Modified on 12/17/2009 (eef).
August 17, 2009	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re:#97913 13 MOTION to Remand filed by Andrew Arnold. Plaintiff's July 1, 2009 motion to remand this case to state court is denied. The Court will next consider the defendant's motion to dismiss and motion fo r summary judgment in this case. Plaintiff's opposition papers to these motions were submitted to this Court's Pro Se office on August 14, 2009. Defendant's reply papers, if any, are due by August 28, 2009. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 8/17/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(tve) Modified on 8/19/2009 (eef).

Date Filed

Document Text

December 15, 2009

Filing 23 OPINION and ORDER re:#98358 5 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(B)(6) and MOTION for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Rule 56. The above Union's June 29 motion to dismiss is granted as to plaintiff's claims for breach of contract and tort ious interference with contract, and the Union's June 29 motion for summary judgment is granted as to plaintiff's hybrid Section 301/fair representation claim on the basis that the claim is time-barred. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 12/15/09); copies forwarded by Chambers. copies mailed by chambers..(djc) Modified on 12/17/2009 (eef).

August 17, 2009

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re:#97913 13 MOTION to Remand filed by Andrew Arnold. Plaintiff's July 1, 2009 motion to remand this case to state court is denied. The Court will next consider the defendant's motion to dismiss and motion fo r summary judgment in this case. Plaintiff's opposition papers to these motions were submitted to this Court's Pro Se office on August 14, 2009. Defendant's reply papers, if any, are due by August 28, 2009. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 8/17/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(tve) Modified on 8/19/2009 (eef).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arnold v. 1199 SEIU
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Arnold
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: 1199 SEIU
Represented By:	Richard Lee Dorn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?