Ross et al v. Thomas et al
| Joel Ross, Eric Levine and Jerde Development Company |
| Stanley E. Thomas and S,Thomas Enterprises of Sacramento, LLC |
| Stanley E. Thomas and S,Thomas Enterprises of Sacramento, LLC |
| Stanley E. Thomas, S,Thomas Enterprises of Sacramento, LLC, Joel Ross, Eric Levine and Jerde Development Company |
| Receiver |
| 1:2009cv05631 |
| June 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Henry B. Pitman |
| Shira A. Scheindlin |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
OPINION AND ORDER that for the reasons that follow, the Receiver's Application is granted in its entirety ($336,210.66), and the Creditors' Application is granted in part ($129,379.27) re: 116 MOTION for Attorney Fees, filed by Receiver, 130 MOTION for Attorney Fees, filed by Joel Ross, Jerde Development Company, Eric Levine. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 6/6/11) (cd)
|
|
Filing
85
OPINION AND ORDER re: Granting 73 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Damages on First and Second Causes of Action. MOTION to Dismiss Defendants Counterclaims is granted in part and denied in part. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment on plaintiffs' First and Second Causes of Action and to close this motion (Docket NO. 73). A conference is scheduled for November 9, 2010 at 4:30 p.m. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 10/7/10) (djc) Modified on 10/8/2010 (djc).
|
|
Filing
69
OPINION AND ORDER re: 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' First and Second Causes of Action. For reasons further set forth in said Order, the Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment with respect to their First and Second Causes of Action is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion (Docket No. 52). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/15/10) (db)
|
|
Filing
50
OPINION AND ORDER #98619 that for the reasons set forth herein the defendants' motion to dismiss is granted. Plaintiffs' Seventh and Eighth Causes of Action are dismissed without prejudice to refile it defendants refuse to honor the exerci se of plaintiffs' Put Option after the Company has obtained Entitlement. Because I conclude that the plaintiffs' Seventh and Eighth Causes of Action should be dismissed, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on these causes of action is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close these motions (Docket No. 34 and 42). A conference is scheduled for 3/9/10 at 4:30 p.m. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/1/10) (dle) Modified on 3/5/2010 (ajc).
|
|
Filing
31
OPINION AND ORDER #98223 that for the reasons discussed herein, defendants' motin to dismiss and request for a stay of discovery are denied. The Clerk of the court is directed to close this motion (document no. 13). A conference is scheduled for 2/25/10 at 4:30 p.m. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 11/5/09) (dle) Modified on 11/10/2009 (eef).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
