Skalafuris v. City of New York et al
| Angelo J. Skalafuris |
| City of New York and New York City College of Technology |
| 1:2009cv05693 |
| June 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Westchester |
| Shira A. Scheindlin |
| None |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
OPINION AND ORDER re:#98715 15 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by New York City College of Technology, City of New York, 18 MOTION CROSS MOTION COUNTER TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, filed by Angelo J. Skalafuris: for the reasons stated above, Skalafuris's NY?SHRL and ADEA claims are dismissed. Ordinarily, I would permit Skalafuris, as a pro se plaintiff, to amend him complaint. However, because these claims are barred respectively by the election of remedies doctrine and the sovereign immunity doctrine, granting leave to amend would be futile. Accordingly, chose claims are dismissed with prejudice. In addition, because I have already dismissed Skalafuris' state and federa l claims, I need not address his motion for summary judgment, which is hereby denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to close these motions (Docket Nos. 15 and 18) and this case. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/22/10) (cd) Modified on 3/24/2010 (eef).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
