Webadviso v. Bank of America Corporation et al
| Webadviso |
| Bank of America Corporation and Merrill Lynch |
| 1:2009cv05769 |
| June 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Denny Chin |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM DECISION, for the reasons set forth above and in the 12/31/09, memorandum decision, summary judgment is hereby granted in favor of defendants dismissing the complaint and awarding them the relief requested in their counterclaims. Defendants shall submit a proposed final judgment, on notice, within five days hereof. (Signed by Judge Denny Chin on 2/16/10) (cd)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM DECISION: As I ruled on the record on July 15, 2009, defendants' motion for a preliminary injunction is granted. Yung, Webadviso, and their agents and representatives are enjoined from using the domain names "bofaml.com" and "mlbofa.com" and any iterations thereof during the pendency of this lawsuit. In addition, ownership of the two domain names shall remain with Bank of America at least during the pendency of this case. From the record before the Court, it w ould appear that Yung has not asserted a viable claim in his complaint and that he does not have a viable defense to defendants' counterclaims. At the July 15th hearing, defendants stated that they did not need any discovery and expressed a desi re to reach the merits quickly. Moreover, in their papers on the preliminary injunction motion, defendants laid out their arguments. Under all the circumstances, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause, in writing, on or before January 12, 2010, wh y summary judgment should not be granted against him, dismissing his complaint and awarding defendants the relief requested in their answer and counterclaims. In his opposition papers, Yung must provide whatever evidence and arguments he has to suppo rt his claims and to oppose defendants' counterclaims, and he must identify any genuine issues of material fact that he believes warrant a trial. If he takes the position that discovery is necessary, he must identify what evidence he seeks and explain how that evidence would be relevant. If Yung fails to respond on a timely basis, I will decide the question of summary judgment without his input. (Signed by Judge Denny Chin on 12/31/2009) (rw) Modified on 1/4/2010 (rw).
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER....the request for a temporary restraining order is hereby denied. The request for the order to show cause will be discussed at defendants' hearing for a preliminary injunction. The hearing was initially scheduled for 7/14/09. It is hereby adjourned to 7/15/09 at 4:00 pm. If plaintiff has not served defendants with his current set of papers, he shall do so by overnight mail no later than 7/9/09. (Signed by Judge Denny Chin on 7/8/09) (cd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
