Malena et al v. Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC et al

Plaintiff: Fredda Malena
Defendant: Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC, Victoria's Secret Direct New York, LLC, Victoria's Secret Direct Media, Inc., Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC, Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc., Limited Brands, Inc., Limited Brands Direct Media Production, Inc. and Ann O'Malley
Case Number: 1:2009cv05849
Filed: June 25, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Queens
Presiding Judge: William H. Pauley
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 96 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 76 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 82 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth in this Order, Defendants motions are GRANTED in part and DE NIED in part. Specifically, the Corporate Defendants motion for summary judgment is granted as to the claims for aiding and abetting under the NYSHRL and NYCHRL and for violation of the NYSLLs spread-of-hours provision. The Corporate Defendants moti on is denied in all other respects. OMalleys motion for summary judgment is granted as to the claims for FMLA retaliation, direct liability for discrimination under the NYSHRL, and violation of the NYSLLs spread-of-hours provision. OMalleys motion i s denied in all other respects. Plaintiffs withdrawn claimsfor failure to keep accurate records under the FLSA, failure to keep accurate records under the NYSLL, and failure to provide meal breaks under the NYSLLare dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at docket entry numbers 76 and 82. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/16/2012) (tro)
November 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Certify Class; denying 27 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the FLSA and the New York State Labor Law claim s is denied, and Plaintiffs motion for collective action certification is granted in part and denied in part. The parties are directed to submit a proposed notice for approval by the Court no later than December 7, 2010. If the parties cannot agree on a form of notice, they shall submit letter memoranda by December 7, 2010. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 11/16/2010) (jar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Malena et al v. Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fredda Malena
Represented By: Jeffrey I. Schulman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Victoria's Secret Direct New York, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Victoria's Secret Direct Media, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Limited Brands, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Limited Brands Direct Media Production, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ann O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?