Gruss v. Zwirn et al
Perry A. Gruss |
Daniel B. Zwirn, D.B. Zwirn & Co., L.P. and D.B. Swirn Partners, L.L.C. |
1:2009cv06441 |
July 20, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Denny Chin |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons stated above, by November 26, 2013, Gibson Dunn will produce for this Court's in camera inspection its interview notes pertaining to the twenty-one witnesses whose statements were disclosed to the SEC. The Court will determine what portion of these documents constitutes opinion work product, and will order production of the rest. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 11/19/2013) (cd) |
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons stated above, the magistrate judge's July 14, 2011 ruling is clearly erroneous in holding that no waiver occurred when Defendants disclosed portions of the interview notes and summaries to the SEC. Acc ordingly, the July 14, 2011 is reversed to that extent. By July 17, 2013, Defendants will produce for this Court's in camera inspection interview notes and summaries pertaining to the twenty-one witnesses whose statements were disclosed to the SEC. The Court will determine what portion of these documents constitutes opinion work product, and will order production of the rest. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 7/10/2013) (cd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.