L.K. v. The City of New York et al
| L.K. |
| The City of New York, Neil Hernandez, John Doe #1, Hyman and Frank Elaiho |
| 1:2009cv07012 |
| August 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Paul G. Gardephe |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER, Settlement Conference set for 1/26/2010 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 12/21/09) (cd)
|
|
Filing
10
CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: All parties do not consent to conducting further proceedings before a Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). This case is to be tried to a jury. Deposition due by 4/8/2010. Discovery due by 4/8/2010. Status Conference set for 2/5/2010 at 10:30 AM before Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Counsel for the parties have conferred and their present best estimate of the length of trial is 3 to 4 days. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 12/7/2009) (jpo)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER, 11/17/09 Initial Conference reset for 12/8/2009 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom 18B, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Paul G. Gardephe. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 11/13/09) (cd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
