Warlich & Co., LLC v. Michel et al
| Warlich & Co., LLC |
| Samuel Prakazrel Michel and Samuel Prakazrel Michel doing business as Experience Experience |
| 1:2009cv07172 |
| August 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Victor Marrero |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT #10,0171 that plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment against defendants is hereby GRANTED, and that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment in an amount of $282,240.00 pursuant to FRCP 55(b)(2) is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to withdraw any pending motions in the action and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 1/29/10) (cd) Modified on 1/30/2010 (ml).
|
| ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney Troy L. Kessler to RE-FILE Document #8 FIRST MOTION for Default Judgment as to all defendants. ERROR(S): Supporting Documents are filed separately, using the Event Types found under Replies, Oppositions and Supporting Documents. ***REMINDER*** - First Re-File Motion, then file and link any supporting documents. DO NOT electronically file letters. (db) |
| Filing 8 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FIRST MOTION for Default Judgment as to all defendants. Document filed by Warlich & Co., LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Notice of Motion for Entry of Default, #3 Request to Enter Default, #4 Declaration in Support, #5 Exhibit A - Declaration, #6 Exhibit B - Declaration, #7 Exhibit C - Declaration, #8 Exhibit D - Declaration, #9 Exhibit E - Declaration, #10 Affidavit of Jeffrey Warlich, #11 Clerk's Certificate, #12 Text of Proposed Order)(Kessler, Troy) Modified on 1/29/2010 (db). |
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT. Document filed by Warlich & Co., LLC.(Matura, Marijana) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: that plaintiff herein is directed to inform the Court by December 22, 2009 with regard to the status of this matter and plaintiff's contemplation concerning further proceedings in this case. In the event no timely response to this Order is submitted the Court may dismiss the action for lack of prosecution. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 12/17/2009) (tve)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Victor Marrero. Judge Gerard E. Lynch is no longer assigned to the case. (ldi) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Service was accepted by SamuelPrakazrelMichel. Document filed by Warlich & Co., LLC. (Kessler, Troy) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Samuel Prakazrel Michel(Individually) served on 9/22/2009, answer due 10/13/2009. Service was accepted by Samuel Prakazrel Michel. Document filed by Warlich & Co., LLC. (Kessler, Troy) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Warlich & Co., LLC.(ama) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Samuel Prakazrel Michel(Individually), Samuel Prakazrel Michel. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 697268)Document filed by Warlich & Co., LLC.(ama) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Samuel Prakazrel Michel(Individually), Samuel Prakazrel Michel. (ama) |
| Case Designated ECF. (ama) |
| Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV is so designated. (ama) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
