Sims v. Goldberg et al
| Nathaniel Sims |
| Goldberg, Warden, Aramark, John Doe #1 and John Doe # 2 |
| 1:2009cv07302 |
| August 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Westchester |
| P. Kevin Castel |
| Andrew J. Peck |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the County Defendants' motion to dismiss. Because the motion refers to matters outside the pleadings, the Court will treat it as a summary judgment motion. The Court extends plaintiff Sims' response time to December 7, 2009 (and defendants' reply papers shall be due December 14, 2009), and must comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Rules 56.1 and 56.2 (notice of which defendants gave to plaintiff). The motion will be finally decided by Judge Castel, unless all parties agree to have me decide the motion (or the entire case) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Forms are enclosed. Ms. Rotini is to determine the views of all parties and advise the Court by December 7, 2009. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck on 11/23/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
