Securities and Exchange Commission v. Elliott et al
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Doyle Scott Elliott, Scott Elliott, Inc., Michael J. Xirinachs, Emerald Asset Advisors L.L.C., Robert L. Weidenbaum and CLX Associates Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv07594
Filed: September 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 260 OPINION & ORDER. For the reasons set forth above, the Court concludes that the SEC's lien has priority over Patricia Jackson's liens with respect to the sale proceeds of the properties located at 30 Baycrest Avenue, Huntington Bay, Suffo lk County, New York 11743 and 724 Stonehouse Road, Winhall, Vermont 05340. The Liquidation Agent is hereby directed to distribute the proceeds from these two properties to the SEC in partial satisfaction of the July 26, 2012 Amended Judgment entered against Michael J. Xirinachs. Ms. Jackson is directed to dissolve all restraining notices, writs, or any other state efforts to encumber, garnish, or dissipate the sale proceeds from the Vermont Property or the Baycrest Property. (As further set forth in this order) (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 4/15/2016) (lmb)
June 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 148 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in this Opinion and Order, defendants are permanently enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. 77e; they are enjoined for a period of three years from engaging, participat ing or advising in any way in the sale of penny stocks; they shall pay a First Tier civil fine in the amount of $6,500 per transaction ( a total amount to be determined after a proffer from the SEC as to the precise number of violations) and def endants shall jointly and severally disgorge $3,052,752 in profits attributable to sales of Universal Express stock plus $730,621 in prejudgment interest and defendant Xirinachs shall disgorge $345,462 in amounts paid to him by North A tlantic in connection with sales of Universal Express stock he made on its behalf plus $82,680.01 in prejudgment interest. The SEC shall submit a proffer as to the number of transactions at issue, with citations to the record, not later than 6/25/2012. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 6/12/2012) (tro)
August 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 103 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #100666 re: 95 MOTION for Permanent Injunction and other relief against Weidenbaum and CLX & Associates Inc. based upon their Consents and 71 MOTION for Summary Judgment Against All Defendants, filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. For the reasons set forth within, the SECs motion 71 for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the following paragraphs. The SECs motion 95 for entry of an order an order permanently enjoining Weidenbaum and CLX from violating Section 5 and finding them liable for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties is GRANTED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 8/11/2011) (ab) Modified on 8/17/2011 (ajc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Elliott et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Leslie Hendrickson Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doyle Scott Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Elliott, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Xirinachs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Emerald Asset Advisors L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert L. Weidenbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CLX Associates Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?