Erausquin et al v. Notz, Stucki Management (Bermuda) Limited et al
| Matias Erausquin, Enrique Erausquin, Liliana Controne and Yolanda Frischnecht |
| Notz, Stucki Management (Bermuda) Limited, Notz, Stucki & Cie, S.A., Marc Hoegger, Theo Limpach, BDO Compagnie Fiduciaire, Luxembourg, UBS (Luxembourg) S.A., Pricewaterhousecoopers Luxembourg, Frank Dipascali, Jr., Peter Madoff, Andrew Madoff and Mark Madoff |
| 1:2009cv07846 |
| September 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| William H. Pauley |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM & ORDER terminating 53 Motion to Seal Document; 65 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; 72 Motion to Dismiss; 82 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; 100 Motion for Leave to File Document. The motion to se ver the claims against Frank DiPascali and to dismiss the claims against Defendants Notz Stucki Bermuda, Notz, Stucki & Cie, and UBS Luxembourg on forum non conveniens grounds is granted. Defendants' remaining motions are moot. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending motions in this case. Plaintiffs and Frank DiPascali are directed to appear for a conference on September 9, 2011 at 11:30 a.m. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 8/25/2011) (ft)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
