Mallet v. Johnson
| Antonio Mallet |
| Robert T. Johnson |
| 1:2009cv08430 |
| October 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Ulster |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, the Court finds that the plaintiff's filing of the notice of appeal was timely and directs the Clerk to accept it for filing. In directing the Clerk to file the plaintiff's notice of appeal, the Co urt is not extending the time to file the notice of appeal beyond the thirty-day grace period provided by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5). Rather, the Court is directing the Pro Se Office to file and docket a notice of appeal that was timely received. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/19/2012) (jfe)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, The Court has carefully considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically discussed above, they are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained in this Opinion and Order, t he defendants' motion to dismiss is granted. The plaintiff's requests for appointment of counsel and production of a hearing transcript are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint and closing this case. The Clerk is also directed to close all pending motions. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 7/6/11) (pl)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has received the attached application for the appointment of counsel. The application is identical to an application that the Court has already denied. Accordingly, the application is denied without prejudice for the reasons stated in the Court's order of November 1, 2010. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/20/10) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has received the attached application for the appointment of counsel. The plaintiff has failed to show that his claims are likely to have merit, and the application for the appointment of counsel is therefore denied without prejudice. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/1/2010) (lnl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mallet v. Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Antonio Mallet | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Robert T. Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
