Reed Construction Data Inc. v. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
| Reed Construction Data Inc. |
| The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. |
| 1:2009cv08578 |
| October 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Plaintiff |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
215
OPINION AND ORDER re: 168 MOTION To Exclude The Testimony of Plaintiff's Damages and Antitrust Liability Expert Under Rule 702 filed by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 149 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The McGraw-Hill Co mpanies, Inc. As set forth within, McGraw-Hill's motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Frederick Warren-Boulton is GRANTED, and McGraw-Hill's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Summary judgment is granted in favor of McGraw-Hill on all of Reed's remaining claims with the exception of Reed's unfair competition claim. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motions at docket numbers 149 and 168. SO ORDERED. (See Order.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/24/2014) (ajs)
|
|
Filing
200
OPINION AND ORDER re: 172 MOTION to Preclude Plaintiff's Untimely Customer Declarations filed by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, McGraw-Hill's motion to preclude the Ross and Brennan Declarations from consideration in the pending summary judgment motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket number 172. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 6/5/2014) (lmb)
|
|
Filing
144
OPINION AND ORDER: I write to resolve a dispute addressed in correspondence from defendant's counsel dated June 17 and 28, 2013 and in correspondence from plaintiff's counsel June 24, 2013. The reader's familiarity with the prior decis ion of Judge Sweet in this matter dated September 13, 2010 and my prior decision dated April 15, 2013 is assumed. Accordingly, defendant's application for an Order precluding plaintiff from using evidence from K Ross Company, Ulma Form Works an d Siemens for any purpose is denied without prejudice to renewal. This Order does not, of course, modify my April 15, 2013 Order in this matter (Docket Item 141). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 7/15/2013) Copies Sent By Chambers. (rsh)
|
|
Filing
141
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff is precluded from seeking damages with respect to the 26 customers and prospects that were first identified in February and March 2013. Plaintiff is also precluded from seeking lost seat damages. The parties shall complete all remaining discovery buy June 17, 2013. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 4/15/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ft) Modified on 4/15/2013 (ft).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reed Construction Data Inc. v. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Reed Construction Data Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Aurora Cassirer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
