Federal Insurance Company v. Distinguished Properties Umbrella Managers, Inc. et al
| Federal Insurance Company |
| Distinguished Properties Umbrella Managers, Inc., Distinguished Programs Insurance Brokergae L.L.C. and The Distinguished Programs Group L.L.C. |
| 1:2009cv08686 |
| October 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Albany |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
AMENDED OPINION: For the foregoing reasons, Count III fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Based upon the facts and conclusions set forth above, Defendants' motion is granted and the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and costs. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 7/8/2010) (jfe)
|
|
Filing
22
OPINION re: Granting 11 MOTION to Dismiss and the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and costs. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 6/23/10) (djc)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER...ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before 11/24/09. Distinguished Properties Umbrella Managers, Inc. answer due 11/24/2009; Distinguished Programs Insurance Brokergae L.L.C. answer due 11/24/2009; The Distinguished Programs Group L.L.C. answer due 11/24/2009. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 10/26/09) (cd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
