Toomer v. The Department of Education of The City of New York

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Toomer v. The Department of Education of The City of New York

Toomer v. The Department of Education of The City of New York

Plaintiff:	Jeanette Toomer
Defendant:	The Department of Education of The City of New York
Case Number:	1:2009cv09034
Filed:	October 27, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Harold Baer
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 28, 2013	Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER: For the forgoing reasons, the DOE's summary judgment motion with respect to Toomer's September 2010 and May 29,2009, Randolph assistant principal age, race, and gender claims; her April 2009 Gregorio assistant principal g ender claim; her September 2009 Randolph literary coach race and gender claims; and her September 2008 Randolph English teacher age, race, and gender claims is GRANTED. The DOE's summary judgment motion with respect to Toomer's June 2008 Ra ndolph assistant principal age, race, and gender claims; her September 2009 Randolph literary coach age claim; and her April 2009 Gregorio assistant principal age and race claims is DENIED.The Parties are HEREBY ORDERED to appear for a final pretrial conference on April 23,2013, at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom l8D. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 3/28/2013) (ago)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 28, 2013

Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER: For the forgoing reasons, the DOE's summary judgment motion with respect to Toomer's September 2010 and May 29,2009, Randolph assistant principal age, race, and gender claims; her April 2009 Gregorio assistant principal g ender claim; her September 2009 Randolph literary coach race and gender claims; and her September 2008 Randolph English teacher age, race, and gender claims is GRANTED. The DOE's summary judgment motion with respect to Toomer's June 2008 Ra ndolph assistant principal age, race, and gender claims; her September 2009 Randolph literary coach age claim; and her April 2009 Gregorio assistant principal age and race claims is DENIED.The Parties are HEREBY ORDERED to appear for a final pretrial conference on April 23,2013, at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom l8D. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 3/28/2013) (ago)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Toomer v. The Department of Education of The City of New York
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeanette Toomer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The Department of Education of The City of New York
Represented By:	Isaac Klepfish
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?