Briese Lichttechnik Verttriebs GmbH v. Langton et al
Briese Lichttechnik Verttriebs GmbH |
Brent Langton and B2PRO |
1:2009cv09790 |
November 25, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Michael H. Dolinger |
Unassigned |
Plaintiff |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1341 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 306 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 232 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 246 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 254 Motion to Strik ; granting 260 Motion to Strike; denying 276 Motion to Strike. For the foregoing reasons, Defenda nts' motions to strike portions of Mr. Krichever's Declarations, the Plaintiffs' Reply and Exhibit B to the Munoz Declaration are denied for the reasons indicated herein. Plaintiffs' motion to strike Mr. Ortiz's Declaration and its Exhibit A is granted in part. Plaintiffs' request for an award of costs and expenses in connection with the motion is denied. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment of willful infringement is denied and Mr. Ortiz's motion to dismiss the Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied. This Memorandum Order resolves docket entry numbers 232, 246, 254, 260, and 276. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/8/2012) (mro) |
Filing 305 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 286 Motion for Sanctions filed by Hans-Werner Briese, Briese Lichttechnik Verttriebs GmbH, 296 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiffs' motion for sanctions is hereby denied. This Order resolves docket entry number 286. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/23/2012) (lmb) |
Filing 297 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 212 MOTION to Strike, filed by Hans-Werner Briese, Briese Lichttechnik Verttriebs GmbH, 204 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Invalidity, filed by Key Lighting, Inc., 215 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment of Validity of Claims 1-13 and 17-18 of U.S. Patent No. 5,841,146, filed by Hans-Werner Briese, Briese Lichttechnik Verttriebs GmbH. This is a patent infringement action brought by Hans-Werner Briese ("Briese") and Briese Lichttechnik Vertriebs GmbH (collectively "Plaintiffs") against Key Lighting, Inc. ("Key Lighting" or "Defendant"), Brent Langton, B2Pro, and Sergio Ortiz (collectively "Defendants"), concerning U.S. Patent No. 5,841,146 ("the '146 patent"), an umbrella-shaped light reflector for use in photography and videography. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a). For the foregoing reasons, Plainti ffs' motion to strike certain evidentiary proffers is granted to the extent indicated herein. Defendant's motion for summary judgment of patent invalidity is denied, and Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment of patent validity is granted. This Memorandum Order resolves docket entry numbers 204, 212 and 215. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/31/2012) (ja) |
Filing 193 MEMORANDUM & ORDER re: 180 MOTION To Find Documents Intentionally Withheld by Defendants Deemed Admitted Pursuant to Rule 37 filed by Hans-Werner Briese, Briese Lichttechnik Verttriebs GmbH. Plaintiffs' motion is granted to the extent that we have indicated. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger on 10/6/2011) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ft) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.