Affiliated Records Inc. v. Taylor et al
| Affiliated Records Inc. |
| Jayceon Terrell Taylor, Black Wall Street Records, Inc., CZAR Entertainment, Inc. and 101 Distribution, L.L.C. |
| 1:2009cv09938 |
| December 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Naomi Reice Buchwald |
| Plaintiff |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 44 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Affiliated Records Inc. For the reasons set forth above, both Moving Defendants' motion and plaintiff's partial cross-motion are GRANTED in part and DENIED in pa rt. This action shall now continue to a remedies-phase regarding defendant Goldtone's unlawful infringement of plaintiff's copyrights associated with the "Ghost Unit," "You Know What It Is" and "Stop Snitchin Stop L ying" albums. Plaintiff shall submit a letter the Court on or before May 21, 2012, setting forth which copyright remedy -actual damages and lost profits or statutory damages -it elects to pursue against defendant Goldtone. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket Number 44 and to terminate defendants Taylor, Czar and BWS from this action. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 5/14/2012) (tro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
