Romita et al v. Anchor Tank Lines Corp. et al
| Carla Romita, Lawrence Scuder, John Maniscalco and Allison A. Heaney |
| Anchor Tank Lines Corp. and Reliable Transit Corp. |
| 1:2009cv09997 |
| December 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Denise L. Cote |
| Andrew J. Peck |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Finding no clear error in Magistrate Judge Pecks Report other than the adjustments necessary to calculate pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, the Report is adopted with the modifications described above. The Clerk o f Court shall enter judgment against the Defendants for $286,958.49 in unpaid contributions, $101,374.20 in prejudgment interest, $101,374.20 in additional statutory damages, $13,743.00 in attorneys fees and $504.00 in costs, for a total of $503,953.89. The Trustees are also entitled to post judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 on all sums awarded. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. The parties' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision, except for the rate of post judgment interest. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 4/29/2011) (jfe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
