Ennis v. Artus

Ennis v. Artus

Petitioner:	Aaron Ennis
Respondent:	Dale Artus
Case Number:	1:2009cv10157
Filed:	December 14, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Clinton
Presiding Judge:	Deborah A. Batts
Presiding Judge:	Gabriel W. Gorenstein
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 10, 2012	Filing 42 ORDER: Having conducted the appropriate levels of review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein dated August 12, 2011, this Court APPROVES, ADOPTS, and RATIFIES the Report's factual recitations and findings and recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in go od faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. §2253. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 9/10/2012) (ago)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 10, 2012

Filing 42 ORDER: Having conducted the appropriate levels of review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein dated August 12, 2011, this Court APPROVES, ADOPTS, and RATIFIES the Report's factual recitations and findings and recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in go od faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. §2253. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 9/10/2012) (ago)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ennis v. Artus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Aaron Ennis
Represented By:	Stephen N. Dratch
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Dale Artus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?