Kirkland v. Cablevision Systems
| Garry Kirkland |
| Cablevision Systems |
| 1:2009cv10235 |
| December 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Kevin Nathaniel Fox |
| Richard J. Holwell |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
226
MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 183 Motion for New Trial; denying 186 Motion for New Trial; denying 188 Motion for New Trial; denying as moot 219 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. For the foregoing reasons, Mr. Kirkland's mo tions for a new trial [dkt. nos. 183, 186, 188] are DENIED. The Clerk of the Court shall (1) close the open motions, (2) deny any other open motions as moot, and (3) inform the Court of Appeals that these motions--which form the basis for its order staying Mr. Kirkland's appeal, see Kirkland v. Cablevision Sys., No. 19-1259 (2d Cir. May 10, 2019)--have been resolved. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 12/11/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: granting in part 80 Motion for Reconsideration re 77 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. filed by Cablevision Systems. Defendants motion for reconsideration [dkt. no. 80] is GRANTED in part. The Court vacates the porti on of its September 30th Order denying Defendants motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs Title VII and NYSHRL retaliation claims and hereby dismisses those claims. Additionally, the Court declines to continue exercising supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs NYCHRL claims and said claims are dismissed without prejudice. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 8/23/2013) (djc) Modified on 8/23/2013 (djc).
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 33 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Garry Kirkland, 55 Report and Recommendations: Having found Judge Fox's decision to be correct and appropriate upon de novo review, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72( b), his Report is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED in its entirety. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, in part, by dismissing Plaintiff's time-barred claims as well as his Title VII and NYSHRL claims alleging race-based termination, hostile work environment, and disparate treatment. Defendant's motion is DENIED as it pertains to Plaintiff's retaliatory discharge claim and all Plaintiff's claims under the NYCHRL. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 9/30/2012) Copies Mailed By Chambers to Litigant. (djc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kirkland v. Cablevision Systems | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Garry Kirkland | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cablevision Systems | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
