Hird v. Storesonline, Inc. et al
Josiane Hird |
Storesonline, Inc., Imergent, Inc., Steven G. Mihaylo, Clint Sanderson and Steven Mijahlo |
1:2010cv00166 |
January 11, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Denny Chin |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The plaintiff's April 25 motion to confirm the April 15 arbitration award is granted. Pre-judgment interest shall be calculated at the rate of 10% per annum, pursuant to Utah Code §§ 15-1-1. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 9/9/2011) Copies Sent By Chambers. (jfe) |
Filing 41 OPINION & ORDER #99815 granting re: 21 MOTION compel arbitration, filed by Steven G. Mihaylo, Clint Sanderson, Rosenvall, Wise, Imergent, Inc. With respect to these defendants, this action is stayed pending arbitration. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 1/6/11) (cd) Modified on 1/7/2011 (ajc). |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff and defendants shall, by October 1, 2010, each submit a letter to the Court addressing the existence of subject matter jurisdiction over this action. The plaintiff and d efendants shall each identify, to the best of their ability, the citizenship of the plaintiff and the citizenship of each of the defendants. The plaintiff shall also explain in her letter what steps she has taken to serve her Second Amended Complaint on the newly added defendants: Brandon Lewis, Robert Lewis, Danks, Rosenvall, Wise, Fredericks, and Scheiner. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon receiving the parties' submissions, the Court will determine whether it has subject matter jurisdict ion over this case. If it does have subject matter jurisdiction, it will decide the April 23 Motion. If it does not have subject matter jurisdiction, it will dismiss this case, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h) (3). IT IS FURTHER O RDERED that failure to comply with any of the terms of this Order may constitute grounds for the denial of requested relief, dismissal of the action, or such other action as may be just in the circumstances. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 8/26/2010) Copies Sent By Chambers. (tro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.