Pizzuti v. USA
| Michael Pizzuti |
| USA |
| 1:2010cv00199 |
| January 11, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Richard J. Holwell |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for (133 in 1:10-cv-00199-LAP-SLC, 72 in 1:10-cv-02585-LAP-SLC, 47 in 1:10-cv-01003-LAP-SLC) Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the petitions for writs of habeas corpus and motions for new trials are DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark these actions closed and all pending motions denied as moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 9/11/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
102
OPINION AND ORDER: If any party wishes to make a supplemental submission concerning the merits of these matters, he is directed to do so no later than May 31, 2019. After that date I shall consider these matters to be fully submitted and ready for decision. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 4/30/2019) Copies transmitted(js)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER in case 1:10-cv-00199-LAP-HBP; denying (19) Motion for Reconsideration in case 1:10-cv-02585-LAP-HBP. By notice of motion dated February 12, 2012 (Docket Item ("D.I.") 19 in 10 Civ. 25851), petitioner Angelo DiPietro moves for reco nsideration of my Opinion and Order dated August 18, 2011 ("August 2011 Order") to the extent that it denied DiPietro's requests for certain discovery. (As further set forth in this Order.) Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, DiPietro's motion for reconsideration of my August 2011 discovery order (D.I. 19) is denied. The due date for petitioners' reply papers is adjourned without date pending resolution of issues raised in D.I. 83 in 10 Civ. 199. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 3/29/2017) Copies Sent By Chambers Filed In Associated Cases: 1:10-cv-00199-LAP-HBP, 1:10-cv-01003-LAP-HBP, 1:10-cv-02585-LAP-HBP (cf)
|
|
Filing
35
OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons in this opinion and order, petitioners are entitled to all Form 302's and notes concerning interviews with or debriefings of Sanginiti, including an unredacted version of the Form 302 DiPietro received in respo nse to his FOIA request. Furthermore, if the Form 302 produced in pretrial discovery is not identical to the unredacted version of the Form 302 produced in response to DiPietro's FOIA request, the government is also to provide an explanation of why two different versions of the same document were prepared. The government is also directed to possession, custody or control. The motions are denied without prejudice to renewal in all other respects. Re: (5 in 1:10-cv-02585-RJH-HBP, 5 in 1:10-c v-02585-RJH-HBP) FIRST MOTION to Vacate (2 in 1:10-cv-00199-RJH-HBP) Order Consolidating DiPietro's 2255 Petition with that of Michael Pizzuti. FIRST MOTION for Discovery. FIRST MOTION to Vacate (2 in 1:10-cv-00199-RJH-HBP) Order Conso lidating DiPietro's 2255 Petition with that of Michael Pizzuti filed by Angelo Dipietro, MOTION for Discovery filed by Michael Pizzuti. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 8/18/11) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:10-cv-00199-RJH -HBP, 1:10-cv-02585-RJH-HBP Copies Mailed By Chambers. Referenced in Case No. 02cr1237. (rjm) Modified on 8/19/2011 (rjm).
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. In Re Pizzuti, et al. Petitioner Joseph Genua, an inmate in federal custody, commenced this habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, claiming that his conviction violated certain of his federally prot ected rights. By motion dated April 27, 2010 (Docket Item 318 in 02 Cr. 1237), petitioner seeks to have his Section 2255 motion supplemented by the arguments made in co-defendant Angelo DiPietro's Section 2255 motion. This request is granted. By the same motion, petitioner also seeks to have counsel appointed to represent him pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3006A. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied without prejudice to renewal....[See Order]... III . Conclusion: Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act is denied without prejudice to renewal. Any renewed application should be accompanied by an affidavit establishing the merits. SO ORDERED: (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 12/7/2010) (bw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pizzuti v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Pizzuti | |
| Represented By: | Bernard Alan Seidler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
