In Re Quigley Company, Inc.
Debtor: Quigley Company, Inc.
Appellant: Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos
Appellee: Pfizer Inc. and Quigley Company, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2010cv01573
Filed: February 24, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Holwell
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 42 MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal filed by Pfizer Inc. Pfizer has moved for a stay pending appeal. The Law Offices of Peter Angelos, P.C. have consented to this stay. As such, Pfizer's motion is granted. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 7/19/11) (rjm) Modified on 7/22/2011 (rjm).
June 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 33 MOTION to Intervene and, in the Alternative, in Support of Leave to File Amicus Brief in Opposition to Pfizer's Motion to Reconsider or Vacate the Bankruptcy Court Memorandum Opinion (Re-filed/Relates to Doc. No. 30), filed by Hissey Kientz L.L.P. and Hissey, Kientz & Herron P.L.L.C. The motion of Hissey Kientz L.L.P. to intervene is granted. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 6/27/2011) (ab)
June 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated on the record today, Quigley's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. Furthermore, the Court has reviewed Quigley's motion for vacatur of the Court's decision and finds that the facts here do not fall within the "few narrowly-defined situations that clearly present 'other reasons justifying relief."' Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller, Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2864 (2010) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)). (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 6/24/11) (rjm)
May 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the ruling of the Bankruptcy Court is REVERSED. Appellant is free to pursue its 400 claims in Pennsylvania states courts. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 5/17/2011) (tro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Quigley Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: Quigley Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos
Represented By: Gregory T. Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Pfizer Inc.
Represented By: John Hyok Bae
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Quigley Company, Inc.
Represented By: Michael Lewis Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?