Synergy Advanced Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Capebio, LLC et al
Synergy Advanced Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
Capebio, LLC, Combimab Inc. and Per Lindell |
1:2010cv01736 |
March 4, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Gabriel W. Gorenstein |
Shira A. Scheindlin |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 OPINION AND ORDER: For the aforementioned reasons, Synergy's motion is denied and defendants' motion is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close these motions [Docket Nos. 87 and 91]. A conference is scheduled for June 17, 2011 at 3 p.m. re: 91 MOTION to Dismiss CapeBio and CombiMab filed by Capebio, LLC, Combimab Inc., Per Lindell, 87 MOTION to Remand to State Court. filed by Synergy Advanced Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ( Status Conference set for 6/17/2011 at 03:00 PM before Judge Shira A. Scheindlin.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/24/2011) (tro) |
Filing 36 OPINION & ORDER re: 9 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Synergy Advanced Pharmaceuticals, Inc. For the reasons mentioned this this Opinion & Order, Synergy Advanced's motion for a preliminary injunction is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this motion (Docket No. 9). A conference is scheduled for 6/14/2010 at 4:30 p.m. (Status Conference set for 6/14/2010 at 04:30 PM before Judge Shira A. Scheindlin.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/27/2010) (tro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.