Glassman v. The City of New York et al
| Donald Glassman |
| The City of New York, The New York City Police Department, Ismael Villalba, Salvador Rosario, Ramon Guillen, Carlos Jimenez, John Doe Numbers 1-3, New York County District Attorney's Office and Dilena Solares Duran |
| 1:2010cv02468 |
| March 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Sidney H. Stein |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
OPINION & ORDER: Ronald Glassman has weathered literal trials and tribulations arising out of his short relationship with Duran. The years it took him to be acquitted of all charges against him have no doubt taken their toll. But legal exoneration i s only a part of what Glassman must show to succeed in his claims against the individual police officers and the City. The record presented to this Court conclusively demonstrates that the officers and the City were constitutionally justified in arre sting and prosecuting Glassman, even if he was ultimately acquitted of the criminal charges against him. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment in their favor on plaintiff's federal claims is granted with prejudice and plaintiff's state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 1/3/2013) (ft)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
