Tarafa v. Artus
| Eddie Tarafa |
| Dale Artus |
| 1:2010cv03870 |
| May 11, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Clinton |
| John G. Koeltl |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 40 Report and Recommendations. For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner's objections to the R&R are overruled, and the Petition is dismissed as untimely. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this action. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 7/18/2013) (cd)
|
|
Filing
38
OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, petitioner's application to stay consideration of his habeas corpus petition while he exhausts certain claims in state court (Docket Item 28) is denied in all respects. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 1/23/2013) Copies Sent By Chambers. (ago)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER re: 20 MOTION for Protective Order, filed by Dale Artus: For the reasons set forth within, there is good cause for the issuance of a protective order and respondent's motion for a protective order (Docket Item 20) is, therefore, granted. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 8/12/2011) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ab)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court notes that the petitioner is complaining about a response by the Office of the District Attorney, Bronx County, to a Freedom of Information Law ("FOIL") request. The response notes that there are proce dures under state law for appealing the partial denial of a FOIL request, and that the petitioner may wish to pursue such proceedings. Pending before this Court is a petition for habeas corpus. The standards are different for obtaining discovery in s uch a proceeding, and would require the petitioner to show good cause for the discovery. See Drake v. Portuondo, 321 F.3d 338, 346 (2d Cir.2003). Thus far the Court has ruled on all applications to the Court for documents in this proceeding, and there is nothing in the petitioner1s letter that causes the Court to alter any of its rulings. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/1/2010) (jmi)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The petitioner's application for the Court to appoint counsel is denied without prejudice to renewal once the respondent has submitted responsive papers, for failure to make the required showing at this time. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/8/2010) (tro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tarafa v. Artus | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Eddie Tarafa | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Dale Artus | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
