Kahala Corp. et al v. Holtzman et al

Plaintiff: Kahala Corp. and Kaha Acquisition VI, LLC
Defendant: Apple Valley Foods, Inc., Holtzman Express, LC, William Holtzman, Getgo, LLC and Xpress Stop, Inc
Case Number: 1:2010cv04259
Filed: May 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Denise L. Cote
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 OPINION & ORDER denying re: 40 MOTION for Reconsideration re: 37 Memorandum & Opinion filed by Xpress Stop, Inc,, William Holtzman, Tri-State Potomac, Inc., Getgo, LLC, Holtzman Express, LC. Defendants do not identify any facts or legal authority that the December 3 Opinion overlooked and the new authorities they cite do not alter this Court's analysis. Defendants' December 17, 2010 motion for reconsideration is denied. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 3/24/2011) (mro)
December 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER: Holtzman's October 20 motion to dismiss is denied. Because Holtzman consented to personal jurisdiction, it is unnecessary to reach the plaintiffs' argument that long arm jurisdiction over Holtzman exists under New York law. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 12/3/2010) (lnl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kahala Corp. et al v. Holtzman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Valley Foods, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Holtzman Express, LC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Holtzman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Getgo, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xpress Stop, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kahala Corp.
Represented By: Vincent Louis DeBiase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kaha Acquisition VI, LLC
Represented By: Vincent Louis DeBiase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?