Janbay et al v. Canadian Solar Inc. et al
| Labib Janbay |
| Arthur Chien, Canadian Solar Inc. and Shawn Qu |
| George Strum, Canadian Solar Investors Group, Kenneth Lee, CSIQ Investor Group, Harry Tabak, Nhan Nguyen and Qian Wang |
| 1:2010cv04430 |
| June 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
OPINION: For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion is granted and the AC is dismissed with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 3/27/2013) (cd)
|
|
Filing
76
OPINION: Based on conclusions set forth above, Defendants' motion is granted, and the Complaint is dismissed with leave granted to replead within 20 days. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 3/30/2012) (cd)
|
|
Filing
51
OPINION, that the motions to consolidate the actions are granted. motion of the CSIQ Investor Group to serve as lead plaintiff is granted, Tabak's motion is granted to the extent that he is appointed co-lead plaintiff and the selection of counsel is approved. The remaining motions to serve as lead plaintiff are denied and the CSIQ Investor Group's motion to transfer is denied. Additional relief as set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 12/18/10) (pl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
