Constelation Energy Commodities Group Inc. v. Transfield ER Cape Ltd. et al
Constelation Energy Commodities Group Inc. |
Transfield ER Cape Ltd. and Transfield ER Limited |
1:2010cv04434 |
June 3, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Sidney H. Stein |
Marine |
09 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 OPINION & ORDER re: 20 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Awards dated April 26 and April 28, 2010 filed by Constellation Energy Commodities Group Inc., 23 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Petition to Confirm filed by Transfield ER Cape Ltd., 9 AMENDED MOT ION to Confirm Arbitration filed by Constelation Energy Commodities Group Inc. For the reasons set forth herein, (1) Constellation's amended petition is granted insofar as this Court recognizes and enforces the arbitration awards against ER Cap e; (2) Constellation's motion for summary confirmation is granted insofar as the arbitration awards are confirmed against ER Cape; and (3) ER Cape's motion to dismiss the amended petition is granted insofar as Constellation has failed to st ate a claim for alter ego liability against ER Limited and that motion is otherwise denied. ER Cape is ordered to pay Constellation a total of $15.045,208 plus 40,559, together with interest as set forth in the COA. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 7/29/2011) (mro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.