Gusinski v. Genger
| Vladimir Gusinski |
| Sagi Genger |
| 1:2010cv04506 |
| June 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Shira A. Scheindlin |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
168
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration and for entry of a new judgment is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion (Dkt. No. 166). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/16/2013) (ft)
|
|
Filing
161
OPINION AND ORDER : For the foregoing reasons, and notwithstanding my reservations about permitting Gilad Sharon to benefit from his own duplicitous conduct and lack oftransparency throughout the Canadian Venture and at this trial, I find for defendant on the issue of the enforceability of the Omniway Note. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in defendant's favor and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 12/20/2012) (pl)
|
|
Filing
144
OPINION AND ORDER re: 130 MOTION for Summary Judgment Dismissing the Third Amended Third Party Complaint. filed by Gilad Sharon. For the foregoing reasons, third-party defendants motion for summary judgment is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motion for summary judgment. (Docket Entry #130). A conference is scheduled for November 29 at 3:30. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 11/19/2012) (djc)
|
|
Filing
129
OPINION AND ORDER re: 115 MOTION for Sanctions filed by TPR Investment Associates, Inc, Sagi Genger. For the foregoing reasons, Gilad Sharon is precluded from denying responsibility for any judgment that Omniway is liable to third-party plaintiffs and from testifying regarding the existence of the Omniway Note. Wachtel is directed to pay attorneys' fees and costs from December 12, 2011 through the date of this Order, and any costs of reinstating and seeking further discovery from Omniway. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 9/5/2012) (lmb)
|
|
Filing
22
OPINION AND ORDER re: 10 MOTION to Sever Defendant's Claims Against All Third-Party Defendants. For the foregoing reasons, Gusinski's motion to sever Genger's Third-Party Complaint is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion [Docket No. 10]. A conference is scheduled for December 15, 2010 at 4:30 pm. (Status Conference set for 12/15/2010 at 04:30 PM before Judge Shira A. Scheindlin.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 11/29/10) (db)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gusinski v. Genger | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Vladimir Gusinski | |
| Represented By: | C. William Phillips |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sagi Genger | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
