Gucci America, Inc. et al v. Li et al
| Gucci America, Inc., Balenciaga America, Inc., Balenciaga S.A., Bottega Veneta International S.A.R.L., Bottega Veneta Inc., Luxury Goods International (L.G.I.) S.A. and Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. |
| Weixing Li, Lijun Xu, MYLUXURYBAGS.COM, XPRESSDESIGNERS.COM, XPRESSDESIGNER.NET, Designer Handbags, ABC Companies and John Does |
| 1:2010cv04974 |
| June 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Richard J. Sullivan |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
176
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court holds BOC in civil contempt for failing to comply with the Court's September 29 and October 16 Orders. The Court also sanctions BOC for its civil contempt, ordering that, if BOC d oes not comply with the September 29, 2015 Order by December 7, 2015, BOC shall pay to the Court a coercive fine of $50,000 for each subsequent day of noncompliance. The Court also grants Plaintiffs' request for reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred m bringing the instant contempt motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall submit, no later than December 11, 2015, an affidavit attesting to their attorneys' fees and costs incurred in bringing t his contempt motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT BOC shall have until December 21, 2015 to submit its objections, if any, to Plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and costs calculations. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 11/30/2015) (mro)
|
|
Filing
158
OPINION AND ORDER re: 135 MOTION to Compel Bank of China to produce all documents requested in the July 16, 2010 and February 23, 2011 Subpoenas and clarifying that "Defendants" covers Defendants newly identified in Plaintiffs� 39; Second Amended Complaint filed by Balenciaga America, Inc., Bottega Veneta Inc., Bottega Veneta International S.A.R.L., Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc., Balenciaga S.A., Gucci America, Inc., Luxury Goods International (L.G.I.) S.A . For the reasons set forth above, the Court concludes that it has specific personal jurisdiction over BOC with respect to the 2010 and 2011 Subpoenas and that exercising such jurisdiction comports with due process and principles of comity. Acc ordingly, Plaintiffs' motion to compel is granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT BOC shall produce all documents requested in the 2010 and 2011 Subpoenas as they pertain to all Defendants, including but not limited to (1) all documents and communic ations regarding Defendants or their accounts, (2) all documents associated with any accounts or deposits held in any Defendants' name, and (3) all documents relating to any checks, money orders, or other negotiable instruments purchased by Defe ndant. For clarification, "all Defendants" covers all Defendants who have been named in this action, including those in the Second Amended Complaint: Wenying Guo, Xiaochao Shang, Lei Xu, Fengyuan Zhao, Liqun Zhao, Ming Zhao, and Peiyuan Zhao. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall submit a letter to the Court by October 15, 2015 apprising the Court of BOC's compliance with the 2010 and 2011 Subpoenas. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion located at docket number 135. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 9/29/2015) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
