Carlson v. Department of Justice

Plaintiff: Daniel Raymond Carlson
Defendant: Department of Justice
Case Number: 1:2010cv05149
Filed: July 6, 2010
Court: New York Southern District Court
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Queens
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Crotty
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05:552
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 19, 2012 38 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION re: 37 Report and Recommendations, 23 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Department of Justice. For the foregoing reasons, the Court adopts the R&R (Dkt. 37) in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket number 23 and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 3/19/2012) (mro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carlson v. Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Raymond Carlson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.