Berall v. Verathon Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan Berall, M.D.
Defendant: Verathon Inc., Pentax of America, Inc., Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc., Aircraft Medical, Ltd., LMA North America, Inc. and AirTraq LLC
Case Number: 1:2010cv05777
Filed: July 30, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Barbara S. Jones
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER: By order dated November 13, 2019 [dkt. no. 141], the Court referred the matter to mediation with a request that pro bono counsel be located to represent Plaintiff at the mediation. Plaintiff shall inform the Court by letter no later than Dec ember 2 whether he is amenable to participating in the mediation. Plaintiff is reminded that if mediation does not proceed, defense counsel will proceed with several motions as set forth in their joint letter dated October 18, 2019 [dkt. no. 133]. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 11/18/2019) (mml) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 141 AMENDED MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is referred for mediation to the Court-annexed Mediation Program. The parties are notified that Local Rule 83.9 shall govern the mediation and are directed to participate in the me diation in good faith. The mediation will have no effect upon any scheduling Order issued by this Court without leave of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall locate pro bono counsel to represent the plaintiff at the mediati on. The time to assign a mediator shall be deferred until pro bono counsel has filed a Notice of Limited Appearance of Pro Bono Counsel. Pro bono counsel will represent plaintiff solely for purposes of the mediation, and that representation will ter minate when the mediation concludes. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any objection by the plaintiff to either the mediation or to the appointment of pro bono counsel to represent the plaintiff in the mediation must be filed within 14 days of this Order. I n the event the plaintiff files such an objection, the referral to mediation is vacated, and this case will not proceed to mediation. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 11/13/2019) (mml) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Mediation Clerk for processing.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berall v. Verathon Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Berall, M.D.
Represented By: Douglas J. Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verathon Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pentax of America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aircraft Medical, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LMA North America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AirTraq LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?