Moreno et al v. 194 East Second Street LLC
Jose Moreno and Mohamed Nazim Kalil |
194 East Second Street LLC |
1:2010cv07458 |
September 29, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Richard J. Holwell |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Mohamed Nazim Kalil and Jose Moreno. For the reasons set forth within, Plaintiffs' summary judgment motion is DENIED. The Court will conduct a hearing on January 18,2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 6A of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, to determine whether Plaintiffs are entitled to have the limitations period equitably tolled. No later th an Friday, January 11, 2013, the parties shall each submit a letter to the Court, in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules and Practices, indicating what witnesses, if any, that party intends to call at the hearing, as well as a list of a ny exhibits that party intends to offer. By separate order, the Court will set a deadline for submission of the parties' joint pretrial order and other filings. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 29. (Evidentiary Hearing set for 1/18/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jesse M. Furman.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/4/2013) (ab) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.