S.A.R.L. Galerie Enrico Navarra et al v. Marlborough Gallery Inc.
||S.A.R.L. Galerie Enrico Navarra and Enrico Navarra
||Marlborough Gallery Inc.
||October 4, 2010
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||XX Out of U.S.
||Barbara S. Jones
|Nature of Suit:
||Assault Libel & Slander
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 5, 2017
OPINION AND AMENDED ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Koutouzis's Motion for Summary Judgment and Marlborough and Levai's Motion for Summary Judgment are GRANTED. The Court vacates its March 31, 2017 Order. (Doc. No. 185). This opinion resolves Docket Nos. 142, 146, 173, and 176. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. All pending motions are moot. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 4/5/2017) (ap)
|October 18, 2013
OPINION & ORDER re: 60 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 57 Memorandum & Opinion Or, In the Alternative, to Amend the Order to Include Permission for An Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C.A. Section 1292(b) filed by Philippe Koutouzis: For t he foregoing reasons, Defendant Koutouziss motion for reconsideration of the March 26 Opinion or, in the alternative, to amend the order to include permission for an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) is DENIED. [Dkt. No. 60]. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 10/18/2013) (tn)
|March 26, 2013
ORDER & OPINION: Defendants motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings are DENIED. [Dkt. Nos. 44, 48]. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 3/25/2013) (ft) Modified on 3/26/2013 (ft).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?