New York Times reporter Charlie Savage's FOIA request to compel the FBI to release data on national security threat assessment, and FBI firearms Shooting Incident Review Team ('SIRT') reports.
The New York Times Company and Charles Savage |
Federal Bureau of Investigation |
1:2010cv07920 |
October 18, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Robert P. Patterson |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. § 552 |
None |
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 CLERK'S JUDGMENT That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated November 7, 2011, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied, and defendants motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 11/8/11) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal)(dt) |
Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER:#100988 Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is denied, and Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 11/7/2011) Copies Sent By Chambers. (rjm) Modified on 11/10/2011 (jab). |
Transmission to Judgments and Orders Clerk. Transmitted re: 23 Memorandum & Opinion to the Judgments and Orders Clerk. (rjm) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert P. Patterson: Motion Hearing held on 9/1/2011 re: 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The New York Times Company, Charles Savage. (ft) |
Filing 22 SCHEDULING ORDER: Oral Argument set for 9/1/2011 at 09:30 AM before Judge Robert P. Patterson. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 8/19/2011) Copies Faxed By Chambers. (lmb) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY PARTIAL DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2): THEREFORE, the parties agree and stipulate as follows: Count II of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ, P. 41(a). (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 5/22/2011) (jfe) |
Filing 20 DECLARATION of Dennis J. Argall in Support re: 12 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.. Document filed by Federal Bureau of Investigation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Onozawa, Tomoko) |
Filing 19 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 12 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. and in opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. Document filed by Federal Bureau of Investigation. (Onozawa, Tomoko) |
Filing 18 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment.. Document filed by Charles Savage, The New York Times Company. (McCraw, David) |
***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney David Edward McCraw to RE-FILE Document 15 Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion. ERROR(S): document error. This document indicates it pertains to the Defendant (see document #13). (ldi) |
Filing 17 DECLARATION of Charles Savage in Support re: 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment.. Document filed by Charles Savage, The New York Times Company. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-B, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D-E)(McCraw, David) |
Filing 16 DECLARATION of David McCraw in Support re: 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment.. Document filed by Charles Savage, The New York Times Company. (McCraw, David) |
Filing 15 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Document filed by Charles Savage, The New York Times Company. (McCraw, David) Modified on 4/18/2011 (ldi). |
Filing 14 DECLARATION of David M. Hardy in Support re: 12 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.. Document filed by Federal Bureau of Investigation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Y)(Onozawa, Tomoko) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 12 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.. Document filed by Federal Bureau of Investigation. (Onozawa, Tomoko) |
Filing 12 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Document filed by Federal Bureau of Investigation. Responses due by 4/15/2011(Onozawa, Tomoko) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Substitution of Attorney. Old Attorney: Amy Ann Barcelo, New Attorney: Tomoko Onozawa, Address: U.S. Attorney's Office - SDNY, 86 Chambers Street, Third Floor, New York, New York, 10007, (212) 637-2721. Document filed by Federal Bureau of Investigation. (Onozawa, Tomoko) |
Filing 10 DECLARATION of DAVID E. MCCRAW in Support re: 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment.. Document filed by Charles Savage, The New York Times Company. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits A-E, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit F (part 1), # 3 Exhibit Exhibit F (part 2), # 4 Exhibit Exhibits G-K)(McCraw, David) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment.. Document filed by Charles Savage, The New York Times Company. (McCraw, David) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Document filed by Charles Savage, The New York Times Company. Responses due by 3/25/2011 Return Date set for 4/29/2011 at 09:30 AM.(McCraw, David) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: Dispositive Motions due by 2/25/2011. Answer deadline 3/25/11. Responses due by 4/15/2011. (Government) Replies due by 4/29/2011. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 1/21/11) (db) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Federal Bureau of Investigation answer due 3/25/2011. (db) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert P. Patterson: Case Management Conference held on 1/21/2011, ( Motions due by 2/25/2011., Replies due by 4/15/2011., Responses due by 3/25/2011., Governments Responses due by 4/29/2011.). (mbe) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint. Document filed by Federal Bureau of Investigation.(Barcelo, Amy) |
Filing 5 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Robert P. Patterson, Jr from Amy A. Barcelo dated 12/16/2010 re: Counsel request a second 4 week extension of time to respond to the complaint to 1/14/11. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 12/17/2010) (jfe) |
Filing 4 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Robert P. Patterson, Jr. from Amy Barcelo (unsigned) dated 11/17/10 re: I am writing on behalf of FBI, and with plaintiffs' consent, to request a four-week extension of time to respond to the complaint. With that extension the FBI's response to the complaint would be due on or before December 17, 2010. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. So ordered. Federal Bureau of Investigation answer due 12/17/2010. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 11/17/10) (rjm) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Federal Bureau of Investigation served on 10/19/2010, answer due 11/9/2010. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by The New York Times Company; Charles Savage. (McCraw, David) |
Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Charles Savage, The New York Times Company.(mro) (mro). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Investigation. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 917535)Document filed by The New York Times Company, Charles Savage.(mro) (mro). |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (mro) |
Case Designated ECF. (mro) |
Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. (mro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.