Union Central Life Insurance Company v. Berger et al
Union Central Life Insurance Company |
Heather A. Berger, Rise K. Cross and Cynthia Steinmetz |
1:2010cv08408 |
November 8, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Paul G. Gardephe |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 106 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons stated above, Decedent's Estate is awarded $161,541.00 in attorneys' fees and $8,079.67 in costs. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 12/12/2013) (cd) |
Filing 98 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, Union Central's motion for summary judgment(Dkt. No. 72) on the interpleader Second Amended Complaint is granted, and Union Central is discharged from this case. Steinmetz and the Estat e's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No.56) is granted as to (1) Steinmetz's claim for the proceeds of the Policy; and (2) the Estate's cross-claim for breach of contract against Cross, and otherwise denied. Cross and Berger's mo tion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 53) is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions (Dkt. Nos. 53, 56, 72).The Estate will file papers in support of its request for expenses, costs and attorneys' fees by September 25, 2012. Any opposition will be filed by October 2, 2012. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/19/2012) (js) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.