Petty v. New York City et al
| Darren Lawrence Petty |
| New York City, Raymond Kelly, Michael Bloomberg, Archibald, The NYPD, Safran, Marvell, Pam Ians, Feliz and NYCDOC Dept. of Citywide Admin. Serv. |
| 1:2010cv08581 |
| November 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Unassigned |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket Entry 70. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/22/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tn)
|
|
Filing
68
OPINION AND ORDER re: 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by NYCDOC Dept. of Citywide Admin. Serv., Michael Bloomberg, The NYPD, Raymond Kelly, New York City: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgme nt is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Entry 36, and to mark the case as closed. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purposes of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 11/25/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
