F. Shih v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

F. Shih v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

Plaintiff:	Yuh-Rong F. Shih
Defendant:	JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Case Number:	1:2010cv09020
Filed:	December 2, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Queens
Presiding Judge:	Unassigned
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 28, 2013	Filing 61 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 56 MOTION for Reconsideration re: 54 Memorandum & Opinion. MOTION for Reconsideration. filed by Yuh-Rong F. Shih. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addr essed above, the remaining arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiffs motion for relief is denied. The Clerk is directed to close this case and all pending motions. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/28/2013) (djc)
March 8, 2013	Filing 54 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the remaining arguments are either mo ot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the defendants motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to all of the plaintiffs claims. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case. The Clerk is also directed to close this case and all pending motions.(Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/7/2013) (djc)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 28, 2013

Filing 61 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 56 MOTION for Reconsideration re: 54 Memorandum & Opinion. MOTION for Reconsideration. filed by Yuh-Rong F. Shih. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addr essed above, the remaining arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiffs motion for relief is denied. The Clerk is directed to close this case and all pending motions. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/28/2013) (djc)

March 8, 2013

Filing 54 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the remaining arguments are either mo ot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the defendants motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to all of the plaintiffs claims. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case. The Clerk is also directed to close this case and all pending motions.(Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/7/2013) (djc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: F. Shih v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yuh-Rong F. Shih
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?