Moody v. The City of New York et al
Mark W. Moody |
The City of New York, Morris, Gonzalez and John Doe 1-10 |
1:2010cv09161 |
December 8, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Richard M. Berman |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. The City of New York served on 12/10/2010, answer due 1/3/2011. Service was accepted by Dmitriy Aronov. Document filed by Mark W. Moody. (Byrialsen, Jane) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Morris served on 12/10/2010, answer due 1/3/2011. Service was accepted by Police Officer Curtis. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Mark W. Moody. (Byrialsen, Jane) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Gonzalez served on 12/10/2010, answer due 1/3/2011. Service was accepted by Police Officer Curtis. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Mark W. Moody. (Byrialsen, Jane) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gonzalez, John Doe 1-10(Individually), John Doe 1-10(In his Official Capacity), Morris, The City of New York. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 923253)Document filed by Mark W. Moody.(rdz) (ama). |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Gonzalez, John Doe 1-10(Individually), John Doe 1-10(In his Official Capacity), Morris, The City of New York. (rdz) |
Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman is so designated. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.