Ortiz v. Bloomberg et al
| Jose E. Ortiz |
| Current Commissioner of the New York City Department of Corrections, (10) Ten John Doe, (3) Three Jane Doe Correctional Officers, Medical Provider of New York City Jails, Meals-Food Provider for NYC Jails, Patty Harris First Deputy Major, AMKC Facility Doctors and Nurses, Michael Bloomberg and John C. Liv |
| 1:2010cv09434 |
| November 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| St.Lawrence |
| P. Kevin Castel |
| Frank Maas |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The R & R set forth Ortiz's repeated failure to file or serve his amended complaint. (R &R at 1-2.) Ortiz has neither objected to the R & R nor requested an extension of time to file an objection. Ortiz received clear notice of the consequences of the failure to object and has thus waived the right to object to the R & R or obtain appellate review. Frank v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 298, 300 (2d Cir. 1992). I therefore adopt the R & R in its entirety, and for the reasons set forth therein, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motions at Docket Nos. 32 and 36, and to close the case. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 8/29/2012) (ago)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
